Mumbai terror attack case: U.S. govt urges Supreme Court to dismiss Rana’s petition for writ of certiorari

Having lost the legal battle in lower courts and several federal courts, including the U.S. Court of Appeals for the North Circuit in San Francisco, Mumbai-attack convict Tahawwur Rana on November 13 filed a “petition for a writ of certiorari” before the U.S. Supreme Court. File

Having lost the legal battle in lower courts and several federal courts, including the U.S. Court of Appeals for the North Circuit in San Francisco, Mumbai-attack convict Tahawwur Rana on November 13 filed a “petition for a writ of certiorari” before the U.S. Supreme Court. File | Photo Credit: AP

The United States government has urged the Supreme Court to dismiss “the petition for a writ of certiorari” filed by Mumbai-attack convict Tahawwur Rana, a Canadian national of Pakistani origin, against his extradition to India.

India is seeking the extradition of Rana as he is wanted in the Mumbai terror attack case. Having lost the legal battle in lower courts and several federal courts, including the U.S. Court of Appeals for the North Circuit in San Francisco, Rana on November 13 filed a “petition for a writ of certiorari” before the U.S. Supreme Court.

In a long battle, this is Rana’s last legal chance to not be extradited to India.

“The petition for a writ of certiorari should be denied,” U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar said in its filing before the Supreme Court on December 16, 2024.

“Rana is not entitled to relief from extradition to India in this case,” she argued in a 20-page submission.

Also Read: Tahawwur Rana wanted a ‘medal’ for ‘top class’ contribution 

In his “petition for a writ of certiorari to review the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit”, Rana has argued that he was tried and acquitted in the federal court in the Northern District of Illinois (Chicago) on charges relating to the 2008 terrorist attack on Mumbai. “India now seeks to extradite him for trial on charges based on the identical conduct at issue in the Chicago case,” the plea has said.

“The government does not concede that all of the conduct on which India seeks extradition was covered by the government’s prosecution in this case. For example, India’s forgery charges are based in part on conduct that was not charged in the United States: petitioner’s use of false information in an application to formally open a branch office of the Immigration Law Centre submitted to the Reserve Bank of India,” the U.S. Solicitor General said.

“It is not clear that the jury’s verdict in this case — which involves conspiracy charges and was somewhat difficult to parse — means that he has been ‘convicted or acquitted’ on all of the specific conduct that India has charged,” Ms. Prelogar said.

Published – December 19, 2024 07:44 am IST

Manas Ranjan Sahoo
Manas Ranjan Sahoo

I’m Manas Ranjan Sahoo: Founder of “Webtirety Software”. I’m a Full-time Software Professional and an aspiring entrepreneur, dedicated to growing this platform as large as possible. I love to Write Blogs on Software, Mobile applications, Web Technology, eCommerce, SEO, and about My experience with Life.

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

Leave a reply

Webtirety Dispatch
Logo
Shopping cart